Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 17 Sep 1997 01:27:35 -0700 (PDT)
From:      asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
To:        itojun@itojun.org
Cc:        tg@ihf.rwth-aachen.de, ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: portlint check to dependency pathname
Message-ID:  <199709170827.BAA20808@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
In-Reply-To: <21220.874484251@itojun.csl.sony.co.jp>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
 * >Can't you just use the whole "${PORTSDIR}/x11/libsx" thing?
 * 
 * 	Yes I plan to use that.
 * 	I was unsure about the interpretation of ${PORTSDIR} in portlint.
 * 	(Should it be "/usr/ports", or should it be "../..".  While testing
 * 	a port people may not be using /usr/ports...)

It should be /usr/ports if the environment variable is not set.  (To
be strict, you should check /etc/make.conf too, but that's probably
asking too much.)  If people have a complete tree, they should have
${PORTSDIR} set to that -- if not, "../.." won't help anyway.

Satoshi



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199709170827.BAA20808>