From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Sep 17 01:27:50 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id BAA29423 for ports-outgoing; Wed, 17 Sep 1997 01:27:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (wck-ca6-02.ix.netcom.com [199.35.213.194]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id BAA29418 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 1997 01:27:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.8.7/8.6.9) id BAA20808; Wed, 17 Sep 1997 01:27:35 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 17 Sep 1997 01:27:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199709170827.BAA20808@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: itojun@itojun.org CC: tg@ihf.rwth-aachen.de, ports@freebsd.org In-reply-to: <21220.874484251@itojun.csl.sony.co.jp> Subject: Re: portlint check to dependency pathname From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk * >Can't you just use the whole "${PORTSDIR}/x11/libsx" thing? * * Yes I plan to use that. * I was unsure about the interpretation of ${PORTSDIR} in portlint. * (Should it be "/usr/ports", or should it be "../..". While testing * a port people may not be using /usr/ports...) It should be /usr/ports if the environment variable is not set. (To be strict, you should check /etc/make.conf too, but that's probably asking too much.) If people have a complete tree, they should have ${PORTSDIR} set to that -- if not, "../.." won't help anyway. Satoshi