From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Jan 2 14:19:26 2001 From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 2 14:19:23 2001 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24C1837B400 for ; Tue, 2 Jan 2001 14:19:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (arr@localhost) by fledge.watson.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f02MJ3e68155; Tue, 2 Jan 2001 17:19:03 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from arr@watson.org) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2001 17:19:03 -0500 (EST) From: "Andrew R. Reiter" To: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu, zzhang@cs.binghamton.edu Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kernel debugging suggestion needed Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG [Sorry for lack of message in this reply but I accidently rm'd the original emails to reply to :-) ] One thing I've done in the past is if it's convenient in a section of code to hijack a function pointer in the kernel, then hijack it so that it will call your code... Silly, and not always really useful... But, Ive done it before.... *-------------................................................. | Andrew R. Reiter | arr@fledge.watson.org | "It requires a very unusual mind | to undertake the analysis of the obvious" -- A.N. Whitehead To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message