From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Apr 19 10:36: 4 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from macbeth.phy.hr (macbeth.phy.hr [161.53.7.201]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AC3337B6AE for ; Wed, 19 Apr 2000 10:35:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kkumer@macbeth.phy.hr) Received: (from kkumer@localhost) by macbeth.phy.hr (8.9.3/8.9.3) id TAA78288 for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 19 Apr 2000 19:35:14 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from kkumer) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 19:35:13 +0200 From: Kresimir Kumericki To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Why do I have lib*_p.a? Message-ID: <20000419193513.A73459@phy.hr> Reply-To: kkumer@phy.hr Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I was under impression that lib*_p.a libraries are "profiled" libraries that should not be built if NOPROFILE=true is specified in /etc/make.conf. I have uncommented this line but after make world I still have lots of _p.a libraries in /usr/lib. What have I got wrong? And while I'm at it, what about .a and .so libs. Again, I seem to remember that .a are aout and .so elf libs. Does any of FreeBSD programs still use aout libs? -- ------------------------------------------------------------- Kresimir Kumericki kkumer@phy.hr http://www.phy.hr/~kkumer/ Theoretical Physics Department, University of Zagreb, Croatia ------------------------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message