From owner-ctm-users@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Sep 10 18:39:32 2003
Return-Path: <owner-ctm-users@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: ctm-users@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4994616A4BF
	for <ctm-users@freebsd.org>; Wed, 10 Sep 2003 18:39:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp1.adl2.internode.on.net (smtp1.adl2.internode.on.net
	[203.16.214.181])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E28643FE0
	for <ctm-users@freebsd.org>; Wed, 10 Sep 2003 18:39:28 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from smckay@internode.on.net)
Received: from dungeon.home (ppp191-23.lns1.bne1.internode.on.net
	[150.101.191.23])h8B1cwVA065554;
	Thu, 11 Sep 2003 11:08:58 +0930 (CST)
Received: from dungeon.home (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dungeon.home (8.12.8p1/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h8B1cvww006900;
	Thu, 11 Sep 2003 11:38:57 +1000 (EST)
	(envelope-from mckay)
Message-Id: <200309110138.h8B1cvww006900@dungeon.home>
To: Julian Stacey <jhs@berklix.org>
References: <200309101132.h8ABWKhZ023995@tower.berklix.org>
In-Reply-To: <200309101132.h8ABWKhZ023995@tower.berklix.org>
    from "Julian Stacey" at "Wed, 10 Sep 2003 13:32:20 +0200"
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 11:38:57 +1000
From: Stephen McKay <smckay@internode.on.net>
cc: ctm-users@freebsd.org
cc: Stephen McKay <smckay@internode.on.net>
Subject: Re: Bytecount too large: cvs-cur.9400xEmpty.gz 
X-BeenThere: ctm-users@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CTM User discussions <ctm-users.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/ctm-users>,
	<mailto:ctm-users-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/ctm-users>
List-Post: <mailto:ctm-users@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ctm-users-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/ctm-users>,
	<mailto:ctm-users-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 01:39:32 -0000

On Wednesday, 10th September 2003, "Julian Stacey" wrote:

>I suggest the boundary limitations fix in 5.x be extended in the CVS tree
>to also include 4.x if possible ?  (4.9 prerelease is mentioned on -stable).

I merged the fix into -stable back in July.  Hence 4.9 will be fine.
Until then you could just delete the check from the source and recompile.

Stephen.