From owner-freebsd-bugs  Tue Apr 11 12:30:06 1995
Return-Path: bugs-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id MAA00614
          for bugs-outgoing; Tue, 11 Apr 1995 12:30:06 -0700
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id MAA00607
          ; Tue, 11 Apr 1995 12:30:04 -0700
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 1995 12:30:04 -0700
Message-Id: <199504111930.MAA00607@freefall.cdrom.com>
From: edward@edcom.com
Reply-To: edward@edcom.com
To: freebsd-bugs
Subject: bin/335: ls -k with BLOCKSIZE=K uses 2k blocks
In-Reply-To: Your message of Tue, 11 Apr 1995 12:22:01 -0700
	<199504111922.MAA02366@edcom.com>
Sender: bugs-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


>Number:         335
>Category:       bin
>Synopsis:       ls -k with BLOCKSIZE=K uses 2k blocks
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    freebsd-bugs (FreeBSD bugs mailing list)
>State:          open
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Tue Apr 11 12:30:03 1995
>Originator:     Edward Wang
>Organization:
UC Berkeley
>Release:        FreeBSD 2.1.0-Development i386
>Environment:

	2.0-950322-SNAP
	BLOCKSIZE=K
	What does environment mean anyway?

>Description:

	see below

>How-To-Repeat:

	setenv BLOCKSIZE K
	dd if=/dev/zero of=x bs=1k count=10
	/bin/ls -kls x
	says "5 -rw-r--r--  1 edward  staff  10240 Apr 11 12:12 x"

>Fix:
	
	Actually, it's only the binary that's screwed up.
	The source looks fine, and worked when I compiled and installed it.
	So.  Why am I reporting this?
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted: