From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Dec 2 12:25:52 1995 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id MAA11971 for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 2 Dec 1995 12:25:52 -0800 Received: from expo.x.org (expo.x.org [198.112.45.11]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id MAA11925 for ; Sat, 2 Dec 1995 12:25:42 -0800 Received: from exalt.x.org by expo.x.org id AA00943; Sat, 2 Dec 95 15:25:09 -0500 Received: from localhost by exalt.x.org id UAA14567; Sat, 2 Dec 1995 20:25:08 GMT Message-Id: <199512022025.UAA14567@exalt.x.org> To: hackers@freefall.FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Minor change to make In-Reply-To: Your message of Sat, 02 Dec 1995 22:38:40 EDT. Organization: X Consortium Date: Sat, 02 Dec 1995 15:25:08 EDT From: "Kaleb S. KEITHLEY" Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > In message <199512021742.RAA14346@exalt.x.org> Kaleb S. KEITHLEY > writes: > > >I want make to silently ignore a failure to find a .include file. The > >reason I want this is because in the next release of X imake will generate > >Makefiles that can use include files for dependencies if the system's make > >supports it. > > >+ #if WANT_FATAL_INCLUDE_FAILURE > > Parse_Error (PARSE_FATAL, "Could not find %s", file); > >+ #endif > > Why not simple change PARSE_FATAL to PARSE_WARNING? > I.e. this diagnostic prints (to help detect wrong includes), > but it will be non-fatal. Humbug. I don't want a build log filled with (more) nonsense warnings; I've already got enough of those as it is. It could emit a warning if make is run with "-d i" or something. Would that make everyone happy? -- Kaleb KEITHLEY