From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Apr 13 18:12:27 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from freeway.dcfinc.com (cx74889-a.phnx3.az.home.com [24.1.193.157]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC85337B422 for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2001 18:12:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from chad@freeway.dcfinc.com) Received: (from chad@localhost) by freeway.dcfinc.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA19658; Fri, 13 Apr 2001 18:11:52 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from chad) From: "Chad R. Larson" Message-Id: <200104140111.SAA19658@freeway.dcfinc.com> Subject: Re: Anyone interested in the SVR4 compat module anymore? In-Reply-To: <20010413153631.A14679@cec.wustl.edu> from Andrew Hesford at "Apr 13, 1 03:36:31 pm" To: ajh3@chmod.ath.cx (Andrew Hesford) Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001 18:11:51 -0700 (MST) Cc: jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Reply-To: chad@DCFinc.com Organization: DCF, Inc. X-O/S: FreeBSD 2.2.8-STABLE X-Unexpected: The Spanish Inquisition X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL40 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG As I recall, Andrew Hesford wrote: > Anyway, I never investigated it, I just scrapped the task after the > first failure. Since then, I have had no interest in the SVR4 binary. I'm interested in it working, as we have a mix of Solaris x86 boxes and FreeBSD. And, we used to use the iBSC2 module to run Interactive UNIX binaries. -crl -- Chad R. Larson (CRL15) 602-953-1392 Brother, can you paradigm? chad@dcfinc.com chad@larsons.org larson1@home.com DCF, Inc. - 14623 North 49th Place, Scottsdale, Arizona 85254-2207 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message