From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 23 19:08:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B414316A4CE for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 19:08:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from lexus.isprime.com (lexus.isprime.com [66.230.130.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66D9443D1D for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 19:08:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pr@isprime.com) Received: from [66.230.128.34] (winter.isprime.com [66.230.128.34]) by lexus.isprime.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i1O384ED059605; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 22:08:04 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from pr@isprime.com) In-Reply-To: <20040223215839.V48887@ganymede.hub.org> References: <05F984A0-665D-11D8-8B23-000A958F0F6A@isprime.com> <20040223215839.V48887@ganymede.hub.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v612) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <9B152AA8-6676-11D8-8B23-000A958F0F6A@isprime.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Phil Rosenthal Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 22:07:40 -0500 To: "Marc G. Fournier" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.612) cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: >2GB Bugs still exist in FreeBSD 4.9 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 03:08:06 -0000 On Feb 23, 2004, at 9:00 PM, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > I build all my systems with the following in make.conf: > > CFLAGS= -O -mpentium -pipe -g -DKVA_PAGES=512 > COPTFLAGS= -O -mpentium -pipe -DKVA_PAGES=512 > > and the following in my kernel config file: > > options VM_KMEM_SIZE="(400*1024*1024)" > options VM_KMEM_SIZE_MAX="(400*1024*1024)" > > I don't know if that will correct your problem, but the above was after > having oddles of problems with 4GB servers and *alot* of processes > running > ... > > I tried raising KVA_PAGES to 512 a couple of hours ago, as the panic seemed to suggest running out of KVA, and it seems to have resolved it. I haven't touched the VM_KMEM_SIZE/VM_KMEM_SIZE_MAX options, however. Reading the LINT notes, this seems unrelated... Are you sure that's a necessary change? Also, for the maintainer of "man tuning", perhaps KVA_PAGES should be documented as servers with >2GB of ram are only becoming more popular -- hell, I have 3.5GB of ram in my workstation nowadays... --Phil Rosenthal ISPrime, Inc.