From owner-freebsd-chat  Sun Mar  2 14:36:22 1997
Return-Path: <owner-chat>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA06950
          for chat-outgoing; Sun, 2 Mar 1997 14:36:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from thelab.hub.org (hal-ns1-18.netcom.ca [207.181.94.82])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA06943
          for <freebsd-chat@freebsd.org>; Sun, 2 Mar 1997 14:36:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from thelab.hub.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thelab.hub.org (8.8.4/8.8.2) with SMTP id SAA15179; Sun, 2 Mar 1997 18:35:24 -0400 (AST)
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 1997 18:35:24 -0400 (AST)
From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>
To: Charles Henrich <henrich@crh.cl.msu.edu>
cc: hasty@rah.star-gate.com, ejs@bfd.com, jmb@freefall.freebsd.org,
        jkh@time.cdrom.com, taob@risc.org, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 2.2 Compiler slower than 2.1? (was RSA 56-bit key challenge)
In-Reply-To: <199703022227.RAA00951@crh.cl.msu.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.970302183443.9863I-100000@thelab.hub.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-chat@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, 2 Mar 1997, Charles Henrich wrote:

> Hmm the one amancio put up seems like the old one.  Try the one at
> ftp.scnc.k12.mi.us/pub/misc/rc5-56-freebsd
>
	Same results, but you mentioned something about new math libs?
I'm running 3.0-current over here (well, current as far as before all
the lite2 instabilities)...