From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri May 16 14:06:29 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA19894
          for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 16 May 1997 14:06:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from crh.cl.msu.edu (crh.cl.msu.edu [35.8.1.24])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA19889
          for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 May 1997 14:06:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from henrich@localhost)
	by crh.cl.msu.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA06178;
	Fri, 16 May 1997 17:06:26 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <19970516170625.60057@crh.cl.msu.edu>
Date: Fri, 16 May 1997 17:06:25 -0400
From: Charles Henrich <henrich@crh.cl.msu.edu>
To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: vim vs. nvi?
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.73
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 2.2-970422-RELENG
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Has any thought been given to importing vim as FreeBSD's vi instead of nvi?

I've found that its syntax coloring improves life a remarkable amount!

-Crh

       Charles Henrich     Michigan State University     henrich@msu.edu

                         http://pilot.msu.edu/~henrich