From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 4 06:19:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 084691065672 for ; Mon, 4 Jan 2010 06:19:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx21.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A74038FC20 for ; Mon, 4 Jan 2010 06:19:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 28830 invoked by uid 399); 4 Jan 2010 06:19:30 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?192.168.0.110?) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTPAM; 4 Jan 2010 06:19:30 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-Sender: dougb@dougbarton.us Message-ID: <4B418876.2070005@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2010 22:19:34 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alberto Villa References: <4B159C5C.2090407@FreeBSD.org> <201001040300.41871.villa.alberto@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201001040300.41871.villa.alberto@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 OpenPGP: id=D5B2F0FB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portmaster-with-package-support release candidate available for testing X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2010 06:19:33 -0000 Alberto, I genuinely appreciate your testing and use of portmaster, so please don't get the wrong idea about my response. But it would be very helpful to me if you could do a couple of things for bug reports. First, if you could start a new thread for each problem that would help me keep track of them. Second, if you could write a brief explanation of what you see as the problem that would also help. While I'm sure what you pasted makes perfect sense to you, it's not always possible for me to recognize the problem when all I have are logs. That said, what I *think* you are reporting is the fact that portmaster seems to be confused between the local package repo that you've configured and the fact that it downloaded a newer version from the remote repo. If I'm right about that, what do you think portmaster should do in this case? My assumption is that people who create local package repositories do so for a purpose, and I'm not sure what to do if those packages are not the latest versions. Doug Alberto Villa wrote: > hello! new problem here: http://pastebin.ca/1736942 (it happens with > portmaster -a too) > > `--> cat /usr/local/etc/portmaster.rc > ALWAYS_SCRUB_DISTFILES=dopt > LOCAL_PACKAGEDIR=/usr/ports/packages > MAKE_PACKAGE=gopt > PM_DEL_BUILD_ONLY=pm_dbo > PM_PACKAGES_BUILD=pmp_build > > `--> ls /usr/ports/packages/*/boost-jam* > /usr/ports/packages/All/boost-jam-1.39.0.tbz > /usr/ports/packages/Latest/boost-jam.tbz > /usr/ports/packages/devel/boost-jam-1.39.0.tbz > /usr/ports/packages/portmaster-download/boost-jam-1.39.0.tbz > /usr/ports/packages/portmaster-download/boost-jam-1.41.0.tbz -- Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/ Computers are useless. They can only give you answers. -- Pablo Picasso