Date: Sat, 20 Jan 1996 18:58:51 -0500 (EST) From: steve hovey <shovey@buffnet.net> To: Bill/Carolyn Pechter <pechter@shell.monmouth.com> Cc: "Garrett A. Wollman" <wollman@lcs.mit.edu>, freebsd-questions@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re:MMDF Message-ID: <Pine.SCO.3.91.960120185742.10379E-100000@buffnet5.buffnet.net> In-Reply-To: <199601192113.QAA17077@shell.monmouth.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 19 Jan 1996, Bill/Carolyn Pechter wrote: > On Friday, Jan. 19, 1996 Garrett A. Wollman wrote: > > > > > <<On Fri, 19 Jan 1996 08:27:43 -0500 (EST), Steve Hovey <root@buffnet.net> said: > > > > > I have freebsd 2.1R and am having trouble porting MMDF to use name, and > > > some other issues to do with inetd. > > > > > My kernal is compiled with options "compat_43" > > > > > My mmdf docs stats that 4.3bsd is not supported in their name server code > > > at this point. > > > > MMDF is hopelessly behind the times. 4.3 has only been out ten years, > > and obsolete for five. I would not waste my time if I were you. > > > > -GAWollman > > > > But it's a hell of a lot easier to work with than Sendmail. > > It's also less of a security problem. > > I'm going to work on mmdf after I resolve a couple of other problems > with my 2.1.0 box. > > BTW -- There's more MMDF out there than you think. > And it runs VERY WELL. It does run well - the mmdf 4.2 with SCO does DNS fine - but there are compiler issues with freeBSD and all I really want to know is what version bsd is freeBSD I guess... if 4.3 is antiquated or whatever then what is it the equivalent of?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SCO.3.91.960120185742.10379E-100000>