From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 22:53:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B8B016A403 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 22:53:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from parrot.aev.net (parrot.aev.net [212.31.247.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D336C43D70 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 22:52:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from soth.ventu (adsl-ull-55-202.51-151.net24.it [151.51.202.55]) (authenticated bits=128) by parrot.aev.net (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kAMN3Rv1068671 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 00:03:33 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from [10.1.2.18] (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.13.8/8.13.3) with ESMTP id kAMMr22T018600; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 23:53:02 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Message-ID: <4564D4CE.1060104@netfence.it> Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 23:53:02 +0100 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061115) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: VeeJay , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <2cd0a0da0611220715n7e88564ahe19f20d033ed39a9@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2cd0a0da0611220715n7e88564ahe19f20d033ed39a9@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 212.31.247.179 Cc: Subject: Re: Does disk encryption causes a performance penalty for Data Access/Read/Write, etc X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 22:53:17 -0000 VeeJay wrote: > Hi > > Does *disk encryption* causes a *performance* penalty for Data > Access/Read/Write, etc? > *Yes*. If your disk is faster than your CPU, I/O will slowdown. I've seen an Athlon64 4200+ use up to 90% of its computing power just to transfer files from an NFS server to a local SATA disk. In case the CPU was less powerful, or otherwise busy doing something else, total throughput would have decreased. bye av.