From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 26 21:30:07 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77616106568E for ; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 21:30:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 650E08FC14 for ; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 21:30:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n2QLU7ee007965 for ; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 21:30:07 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n2QLU7La007962; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 21:30:07 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 21:30:07 GMT Message-Id: <200903262130.n2QLU7La007962@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Bruce Cran Cc: Subject: Re: bin/94635: snapinfo(8)/libufs only works for disk-backed filesystems X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Bruce Cran List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 21:30:07 -0000 The following reply was made to PR bin/94635; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Bruce Cran To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, ceri@submonkey.net Cc: Subject: Re: bin/94635: snapinfo(8)/libufs only works for disk-backed filesystems Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 21:18:03 +0000 Rev 1.16 of src/lib/libufs/type.c and rev 1.2 of src/usr.sbin/snapinfo/snapinfo.c fixed the error where libufs was getting confused when a filesystem was manually mounted. I attemped to replicate the issue on 7-STABLE with a swap-backed md filesystem and it correctly reported when snapshots were present or not, including when I created a file with the same inode number as a snapshot on another filesystem. It looks like the fixes were only committed to 7.x and -CURRENT and were never MFC'd to 6.x. -- Bruce