Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 3 Dec 2012 21:30:13 -0500
From:      Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com>
To:        Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
Cc:        svn-src-stable@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable-9@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r243850 - stable/9/sys/kern
Message-ID:  <CAF6rxg=utFQ9Tp8a4E0zU0ydn1EBHVhVWxQM98%2BaexsQ7GOW9g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20121204014655.GN3013@kib.kiev.ua>
References:  <201212040054.qB40snD5001979@svn.freebsd.org> <CAF6rxgmTEYmgRmn7UO%2Bv293mH8RZ63Ago6cZ8ENoc-C=g9T5uw@mail.gmail.com> <20121204014655.GN3013@kib.kiev.ua>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 3 December 2012 20:46, Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> wrote:
> Less formal, I do not see much use in the single commit spanning both
> sys and non-sys. We almost never should have such interlock, otherwise
> ABI issues would cause troubles for people updating the system.
> And spanning commits are somewhat more cumbersome to both merge,
> revert and for non-developer to pick.

This isn't an issue of sys and non-sys being tied together.  This is
one of documentation and feature being committed together.



-- 
Eitan Adler



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxg=utFQ9Tp8a4E0zU0ydn1EBHVhVWxQM98%2BaexsQ7GOW9g>