From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Feb 9 22:45:53 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA20666 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Tue, 9 Feb 1999 22:45:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ocis.ocis.net (ocis.ocis.net [209.52.173.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA20658 for ; Tue, 9 Feb 1999 22:45:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from vdrifter@ocis.net) Received: from ocis.ocis.net (IDENT:vdrifter@ocis.ocis.net [209.52.173.1]) by ocis.ocis.net (8.9.0/8.9.0) with SMTP id WAA20607 for ; Tue, 9 Feb 1999 22:45:31 -0800 Date: Tue, 9 Feb 1999 22:45:30 -0800 (PST) From: John F Cuzzola To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: ipfw and natd Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, a quick question: when a packet is diverted (ipfw divert) to natd and natd 're-injects' the re-assembled packet back into the packet stream,- is this newly injected packet still checked against the firewall rules? thanks in advance. ps: FreeBSD is the Superior OS :) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message