From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Jul 17 10:57:27 1995 Return-Path: questions-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id KAA13348 for questions-outgoing; Mon, 17 Jul 1995 10:57:27 -0700 Received: from wc.cdrom.com (wc.cdrom.com [192.216.223.37]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id KAA13268 for ; Mon, 17 Jul 1995 10:54:55 -0700 Received: from localhost.cdrom.com (localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by wc.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id KAA06522 for ; Mon, 17 Jul 1995 10:54:46 -0700 Resent-Message-Id: <199507171754.KAA06522@wc.cdrom.com> X-Authentication-Warning: wc.cdrom.com: Host localhost.cdrom.com didn't use HELO protocol Received: from who.cdrom.com (who-internal.cdrom.com [192.216.223.34]) by wc.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id TAA00110 for ; Sat, 15 Jul 1995 19:03:56 -0700 Received: from yucca.cs.odu.edu (yucca.cs.odu.edu [128.82.4.6]) by who.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.11) with ESMTP id TAA02223 for ; Sat, 15 Jul 1995 19:03:50 -0700 Received: from hurricane.cs.odu.edu (jackson@hurricane.cs.odu.edu [128.82.6.19]) by yucca.cs.odu.edu (8.6.4/8.6.4) with SMTP id WAA01709 for ; Sat, 15 Jul 1995 22:00:48 -0400 Date: Sat, 15 Jul 1995 22:01:59 -0400 (EDT) From: Hal Jackson To: WALNUT CREEK tech Subject: question about 2.0.5 CD Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Resent-To: questions@freebsd.org Resent-Date: Mon, 17 Jul 1995 10:54:45 -0700 Resent-From: "Matthew L. Seidl" Sender: questions-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk In the flwg. apps, the mouse events are not seen: xman: pull down menus. No highlight bar. xcd: no mouse events registered by the application ghostview: same. no mouse events seen by the program. However, ctwm, twm, and other window managers see all mouse events. Is this possibly a Tcl/Tk issue? I have tried both the packages and the ports of all possible Tcl/Tk looking programs, with no luck. Under 2.0 this didn't happen. Can you suggest a possible reason why the above three programs act this way? Just installing the base OS including X will demonstrate the problem. It's not like I added something that broke it later. I have even checked out the XF86Config file. No problem there. If you can clue me in on what the problem might be, I'd appreciate it. Otherwise, this was a great release & I look forward to the next one! #include /* include signature */