Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 13:11:58 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.com>, Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org>, Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de>, Steve Price <steve@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ksh93 Message-ID: <20010228131157.B44110@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20010228141838.B33017@hamlet.nectar.com>; from n@nectar.com on Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 02:18:39PM -0600 References: <20010228112329.A9192@hamlet.nectar.com> <200102281813.f1SIDkR54747@vic.sabbo.net> <20010228141838.B33017@hamlet.nectar.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 02:18:39PM -0600, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 08:12:33PM +0200, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> > > Well, ld.so could still break, and anyway you'd lose the ability to
> >
> > Probability of ld.so breakage is quite low, much lower than any of the
> > base libs,
>
> I guess I was thinking in terms of inaccessible /usr, which is the
> most common thing I've run into.
Many, many people today have a huge / with /usr on it. Many of us don't
believe in the traditional partitioning and follow SGI's, HP's, and Sun's
lead in this.
--
-- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
GNU is Not Unix / Linux Is Not UniX
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010228131157.B44110>