From owner-freebsd-cluster@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue May 31 13:58:51 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-cluster@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DDD016A41C;
	Tue, 31 May 2005 13:58:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from so14k@so14k.com)
Received: from ender.liquidneon.com (ender.liquidneon.com [64.78.150.163])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2867043D4C;
	Tue, 31 May 2005 13:58:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from so14k@so14k.com)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by ender.liquidneon.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D8C5A6C31;
	Tue, 31 May 2005 07:58:50 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from ender.liquidneon.com ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (ender.liquidneon.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
	port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 90512-07; Tue, 31 May 2005 07:58:50 -0600 (MDT)
Received: by ender.liquidneon.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 4F486A6C24; Tue, 31 May 2005 07:58:50 -0600 (MDT)
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 07:58:50 -0600
From: Brad Davis <so14k@so14k.com>
To: Daniel Gerzo <danger@rulez.sk>
Message-ID: <20050531135850.GA90363@ender.liquidneon.com>
References: <BAY21-F14C8EE506B422EAB90338DAE040@phx.gbl>
	<751754961.20050531150559@rulez.sk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <751754961.20050531150559@rulez.sk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ender.liquidneon.com
Cc: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org, freebsd-pf@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: (no subject)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Clustering FreeBSD <freebsd-cluster.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-cluster>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-cluster-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-cluster>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-cluster-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-cluster>,
	<mailto:freebsd-cluster-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 13:58:51 -0000

On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 03:05:59PM +0200, Daniel Gerzo wrote:
> Hi Sunil,
> 
> Tuesday, May 31, 2005, 1:14:26 PM, you Cannot open file "C\TXT COOKIES\reply-en.txt"::
> 
> > Hi,
> > I have 3 smtp servers 10.0.0.2, 10.0.0.3, 10.0.0.4 under a cluster with the
> > load balancing done by 10.0.0.1. The pf rule on 10.0.0.1 is
> 
> > ext_if="fxp0"
> > internal_smtp_servers="{ 10.0.0.2, 10.0.0.3, 10.0.0.4 }"
> > rdr on $ext_if proto tcp from any to any port 25 -> $internal_smtp_servers
> > round-robin sticky-address
> 
> > If 10.0.0.4 port 25 goes down, how do I force pf to remove 10.0.0.4 from its
> > table.
> 
> people use CARP for this, don't they?

No.. This is not what CARP does. CARP is for redundant firewalls/routers.


Regards,
Brad Davis