From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jun  2 06:23:40 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 989D7106564A
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Sat,  2 Jun 2012 06:23:40 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from dmagda@ee.ryerson.ca)
Received: from eccles.ee.ryerson.ca (ee.ryerson.ca [141.117.1.2])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FC7D8FC1A
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Sat,  2 Jun 2012 06:23:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [10.0.1.10] (bas2-toronto09-1176130977.dsl.bell.ca
	[70.26.85.161]) (authenticated bits=0)
	by eccles.ee.ryerson.ca (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q526NNPO045885
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);
	Sat, 2 Jun 2012 02:23:23 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from dmagda@ee.ryerson.ca)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: David Magda <dmagda@ee.ryerson.ca>
In-Reply-To: <5C21CA77-966F-4012-9D32-9507ABAD6747@digsys.bg>
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2012 02:23:24 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C141E1AD-DE21-4F9F-B40E-5C72A3453AB5@ee.ryerson.ca>
References: <CAOgwaMvsv3e1TxDauV038Pp7LRiYeH7oAODE+w-pxHt9oGrXMA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120601121555.GF5335@home.opsec.eu> <4FC8B67D.5090208@digsys.bg>
	<20120601131236.GJ8591@macbook.bluepipe.net>
	<20120602010346.GA27660@isuckatdomains.members.linode.com>
	<4D744565-4073-485E-B769-82BE1F7E2C0A@ee.ryerson.ca>
	<20120602032529.GE1377@glenbarber.us>
	<CAOjFWZ7rq_NaAdaKL6Woi-ATy390ax20KWO=V_Jpf9-vJWwgLg@mail.gmail.com>
	<5C21CA77-966F-4012-9D32-9507ABAD6747@digsys.bg>
To: Daniel Kalchev <daniel@digsys.bg>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278)
Cc: FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD ?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2012 06:23:40 -0000


On Jun 2, 2012, at 00:51, Daniel Kalchev wrote:

> On 02.06.2012, at 07:19, Freddie Cash <fjwcash@gmail.com> wrote:
>=20
>>=20
>> Glustre sits above the storage system, replicating data between =
systems.
>> So, disks -- ZFS (via Zvols) -- Glustre.
>>=20
>=20
> How is this different than ZFS using remote zvols via iSCSI? Can it =
tolerate down nodes better than ZFS?

Gluster ~ NFS++.