From nobody Wed Feb 21 20:16:21 2024 X-Original-To: fs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Tg6x22GwFz5BH6b for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 20:16:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Tg6x21CQvz47jr for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 20:16:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1708546582; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=o5WbRXMZbkuTeS61n0cowB7z4Ci934OtdAigd8iPeno=; b=gwy5Kg4XkJTFOZrTE+XqpvzZD9iuD+mocYVzDVvMcXtdim827wGlwAu5xD2533krAeBIQP eQT1IA3e5V8JCe08KkBerUO+2dTnyt+c8jGJVoX4ZFhcxbztwc5v0BEq1LcrWKV8E0Tfj+ ORFPSdEyaWuuusq2TASvJ+OrVDjfd1eH2i3sMIyhoUJwKYBKjajGDGDIL+aIdsyR3wp68M dNVzId9MG+ZjqYK7oL2tgWFRW1IuVI9Ewy2kwv5UAOlTRLQMSni/0zoPBZBYqBP4sV3S+w PqTveQxRlXQpT1+4b9UAHmC8s2SSJxHCQxJBkAbW4ViePwZWmVMUGw1k7pqaKg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1708546582; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=nTCr0KCdIClFpLr4Wr6yHVBXvGOaAaJZl25jfLDjHroMufFqlnKzsNodN7GPJ3/jVJQaVT O+h+KcMx+PlArOuRoYd1Pn3tMevitYmRtmLN26u1hUoseEvkdWO71ZL1kvXgaL1B7zOePi 9MpUvYJicbDlxEoiVlxtjXgWA46KGvO/5k87HcNIMsH6mI1ClubKZjL/EGhDHU8zKxKox5 WgN6P6IRmJO47AO+VT+tE/l2no4yPxFTl+pUhQ8RlVJJ4l7x6NiHpWW8BfqeMSzhW427ik b2rnp+d9LkCPJVOxfRsvAbmMxCPiYnzHkyOHB3k+DW+DjQUEYx7v/ZZlF0D7cg== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Tg6x20GKLz1H8W for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 20:16:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 41LKGLaE082910 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 20:16:21 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 41LKGLBP082909 for fs@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 20:16:21 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 277197] NFS is much too slow at 10GbaseT Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 20:16:21 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: performance X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: h2+fbsdports@fsfe.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: fs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Filesystems List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-fs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D277197 --- Comment #2 from Hannes Hauswedell --- Thanks for the reply! With rsize=3D262144,wsize=3D262144 I get 293 MiB/s. With rsize=3D1048576,wsize=3D1048576 I get 395 MiB/s. This is already an improvement, but still not where I would like to have it. nconnect and readahead don't seem to make much of a difference. NFS3 vs NFS4 also not. Interestingly, if I boot Linux on the client, and perform a regular NFS mou= nt with no options supplied, I get almost 600 MiB/s. This was even performed before changing the server setting. It seems to indicate that our problems = are client-side. These are the options that Linux reports as used: ``` rw,relatime,vers=3D3,rsize=3D131072,wsize=3D131072,namlen=3D255,hard,proto= =3Dtcp,timeo=3D600,retrans=3D2,sec=3Dsys,mountaddr=3D1.3.1.2,mountvers=3D3,= mountport=3D820,mountproto=3Dudp,local_lock=3Dnone,addr=3D1.3.1.2 ``` So it seems to get a much higher throughput with lower rsize and wsize. I w= ill try Linux next with higher rsize and wsize. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=