From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 10 12:44:10 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F9CD47F for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 12:44:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rmacklem@uoguelph.ca) Received: from esa-jnhn.mail.uoguelph.ca (esa-jnhn.mail.uoguelph.ca [131.104.91.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35C0828EE for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 12:44:09 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqQEAG+gVlKDaFve/2dsb2JhbABZgz9Sgyi9K0qBOHSCJQEBAQQBAQEgKyALGw4KAgINGQIjBgEJJgYIBwQBHASHUwMPDKZpiD8NiWuBKYsxgTSBBQEzB4JqgTkDlTpigxiLHYU2g0AgMoEDOQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.90,1071,1371096000"; d="scan'208";a="59046975" Received: from muskoka.cs.uoguelph.ca (HELO zcs3.mail.uoguelph.ca) ([131.104.91.222]) by esa-jnhn.mail.uoguelph.ca with ESMTP; 10 Oct 2013 08:43:01 -0400 Received: from zcs3.mail.uoguelph.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by zcs3.mail.uoguelph.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7482B40AE; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 08:43:01 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 08:43:01 -0400 (EDT) From: Rick Macklem To: Freddie Cash Message-ID: <2072986787.39262172.1381408981871.JavaMail.root@uoguelph.ca> In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [zfs] BSD ZFS vs. illumos ZFS MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Originating-IP: [172.17.91.201] X-Mailer: Zimbra 7.2.1_GA_2790 (ZimbraWebClient - FF3.0 (Win)/7.2.1_GA_2790) Cc: freebsd-fs , zfs@lists.illumos.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 12:44:10 -0000 Freddie Cash wrote: > On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Tim Cook wrote: >=20 > > From a downside perspective I beleive FreeBSD still has no solid > > block > > target stack. I believe SpectraLogic gave some code to the effort > > but it's > > not yet fully baked? There's also no ALUA support that I'm aware > > of - GEOM > > only supports active/passive pathing. > > > > From the NAS side of things, FreeBSD has no concept of an in-kernel > > licensed CIFS stack, it relies on SAMBA. The one thing I would say > > on this > > front is it's likely to be less of a concern as SAMBA embraces > > SMB3. I > > don't see any way that the in-kernel stack in illumos is getting > > smb3 > > support unless there's work and money behind it I'm not aware of. > > > > I also don't believe FreeBSD has any support for nfsv4 or 4.1/pnfs. > > It's > > admittedly been a while since I've played with running it as a > > server so > > some or all of the above may have been addressed. I'll leave it to > > someone > > like Pawel to correct me where I'm wrong. > > >=20 > =E2=80=8BFreeBSD has NFSv4 client and server support. Has for awhile now= . I > believe it's experimental in 8.x and default in 9.x? >=20 > And Rick Maclem (hope I spelt that right) has NFSv4.1 client support > available for testing in 10.x? At least, I vaguely remember a head's > up > about it around a month or so ago. >=20 Yes, the 4.1 client side (including pNFS support for File Layouts only) is in 10.0. There is server code in projects/nfsv4.1-server, but it does not include pNFS (and I don't plan on trying to do pNFS support, since it is a major project). The main piece missing from the NFSv4.1 server is backchannel support (for callbacks) in sessions and I am currently working on that. rick > -- > Freddie Cash > fjwcash@gmail.com > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-fs@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"