From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Jun 25 9:44:28 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from heaven.gigo.com (unknown [209.0.55.69]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E871B15656 for ; Fri, 25 Jun 1999 09:44:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jfesler@gigo.com) Received: from [209.0.55.69] (unknown [209.0.55.69]) by heaven.gigo.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DE79474; Fri, 25 Jun 1999 09:44:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 09:44:16 -0700 (PDT) From: To: Stuart Henderson Cc: Mark Conway Wirt , Bryan Bunch , "Mike Avery (on the road)" , freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: why not uucp, instead of smtp and static ip? In-Reply-To: <3773B194.BAC2F717@eclipse.net.uk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > Exchange doesn't even let you use ETRN if you use an ISDN router. Somebody (can't remember who off hand) made a "etrn.exe" for windows. It didn't care what mail program you ran or anything else. It simply asked for etrn. Our on-demand ISDN users used it as an event; the network traffic caused the routers to dial automaticly. It worked well for them, regardless of whether it was exchange, notes, or whatever other hoaky excuse for smtp they had... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message