Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 09 Dec 1998 01:52:38 -0800
From:      David Greenman <dg@root.com>
To:        Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>
Cc:        Matt Behrens <matt@zigg.com>, "Mark S. Reichman" <mark@borg.com>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: UFS defragmenter and/or partition resizer? (Wishful thinking?) 
Message-ID:  <199812090952.BAA29397@root.com>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>Well, it would be nice to say that UFS doesn't need defragmentation,
>>but it's not quite true.  In practice, though, it's much less of a
>>problem than with Microsoft.  And unfortunately we currently don't
>>have a defragmenter.

   I said:

>   Actually -current does dynamic defragmentation; that's what the
>"doreallocblks" stuff is all about and why it was so important to get
>it working. There is a Usenix paper on this by Keith Smith at Havard;
>sorry I don't have a URL.

   Oops, that should be "Keith Smith at Harvard". I think the
paper was presented about 3 or 4 years ago at the Usenix Technical
Conference.

-DG

David Greenman
Co-founder/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199812090952.BAA29397>