From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Apr 22 19:45:15 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from zoon.lafn.org (zoon.lafn.org [206.117.18.9]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFF4B37B423 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 19:45:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Received: from [10.0.1.100] (cs-lake1-p21.lafn.org [192.168.11.21] (may be forged)) by zoon.lafn.org (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f3N2ikC82484; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 19:44:46 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: bc979@mail.lafn.org Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <200104230222.f3N2MI881425@harmony.village.org> References: <20010422142747.B90395@ringworld.oblivion.bg> <20010420212815Q.jkh@osd.bsdi.com> <20010421200616.A9132@jellyfish.codefactory.se> <20010421233308T.jkh@osd.bsdi.com> <20010422084108.A17749@jellyfish.codefactory.se> <200104230222.f3N2MI881425@harmony.village.org> Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2001 19:41:24 -0700 To: Warner Losh From: Doug Hardie Subject: Re: The RELENG_4 (aka -stable) branch is now unfrozen Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 20:22 -0600 4/22/01, Warner Losh wrote: >In message <20010422142747.B90395@ringworld.oblivion.bg> Peter >Pentchev writes: >: Yes, this is exactly the idea of this branch - critical fixes only. > >And if you aren't the security officer or the release engineer, the >branch is stricktly off limits. > >Warner > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message I think this statement needs some clarification. Why maintain a branch if no one is to use it? -- -- Doug To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message