From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Nov 20 01:24:08 1995 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id BAA19347 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 20 Nov 1995 01:24:08 -0800 Received: from cls.net (freeside.cls.de [192.129.50.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with SMTP id BAA19249 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 1995 01:24:01 -0800 Received: by mail.cls.net (Smail3.1.29.1) from allegro.lemis.de (192.109.197.134) with smtp id ; Mon, 20 Nov 95 09:24 GMT From: grog@lemis.de (Greg Lehey) Organisation: LEMIS, Schellnhausen 2, 36325 Feldatal, Germany Phone: +49-6637-919123 Fax: +49-6637-919122 Reply-To: grog@lemis.de (Greg Lehey) Received: (grog@localhost) by allegro.lemis.de (8.6.9/8.6.9) id KAA21765 for hackers@freebsd.org; Mon, 20 Nov 1995 10:16:52 +0100 Message-Id: <199511200916.KAA21765@allegro.lemis.de> Subject: Re: panic: free vnode isn't To: hackers@freebsd.org (FreeBSD Hackers) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 1995 10:16:52 +0100 (MET) In-Reply-To: from "Brian Tao" at Nov 19, 95 11:32:39 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Length: 659 Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk Brian Tao writes: > > On Sun, 12 Nov 1995, Bruce Evans wrote: > > > > Perhaps known bogus options should be checked for in a central source file: > > > > #ifdef CHILD_MAX > > #warning "bogus option CHILD_MAX, RTFM setrlimit(2), sh(1) (ulimit)" > > #endif > > CHILD_MAX (and I assume OPEN_MAX) is bogus now? It was still in > the LINT config as of 2.1.0-951026-SNAP... what is the recommended > method for raising the default resource limits for a user then? An even better question is: when will the LINT config be updated? Just recently the descriptions of CHILD_MAX and OPEN_MAX have been updated, but there's been no mention of deprecation. Greg