From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 20 12:47:39 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4978B37B404; Sun, 20 Apr 2003 12:47:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DB6A43FBD; Sun, 20 Apr 2003 12:47:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.pr.watson.org [192.0.2.3]) by fledge.watson.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h3KJltua091394; Sun, 20 Apr 2003 15:47:55 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2003 15:47:53 -0400 (EDT) From: Robert Watson X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: David Schultz In-Reply-To: <20030420192319.GB4963@HAL9000.homeunix.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: bmah@FreeBSD.ORG cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG cc: David O'Brien Subject: Re: HEADS UP: UFS2 now the default creation type on 5.0-CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2003 19:47:39 -0000 On Sun, 20 Apr 2003, David Schultz wrote: > On Sun, Apr 20, 2003, David O'Brien wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 20, 2003 at 11:31:21AM -0400, Robert Watson wrote: > > > There were initially some size glitches because UFS2 required additional > > > 64-bit operations in the boot record, and that exceeded the space at the > > > front of the file system, but I believe that has now been resolved. > > > > s/resolved/hacked around/ > [...] > > revision 1.10 > > date: 2003-02-24 04:57:01; author: mckusick; state: Exp; lines: +2 -0 > > Revert to old (broken for over 1.5Tb filesystems) version of cgbase > > so that boot loader once again will fit. > > It might be worth noting the size limit on the root filesystem somewhere > for the unfortunate person who decides not to partition. True. I wonder if we should add some mechanical support for that in sysinstall's label editor to detect and warn in that case. We used to (I believe) have similar warnings about the root file system being <1024 cylinders, etc, at various points. Also, a note in the release notes wouldn't hurt. Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects robert@fledge.watson.org Network Associates Laboratories