From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Jun  8 16:54:34 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id QAA03125
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 8 Jun 1995 16:54:34 -0700
Received: from cs.weber.edu (cs.weber.edu [137.190.16.16])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id QAA03119
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu, 8 Jun 1995 16:54:33 -0700
Received: by cs.weber.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1.1)
	id AA29785; Thu, 8 Jun 95 17:47:29 MDT
From: terry@cs.weber.edu (Terry Lambert)
Message-Id: <9506082347.AA29785@cs.weber.edu>
Subject: Re: BSDi 2.0 binary compatibility question
To: fenner@parc.xerox.com (Bill Fenner)
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 95 17:47:28 MDT
Cc: wpaul@skynet.ctr.columbia.edu, hackers@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <95Jun8.163254pdt.49859@crevenia.parc.xerox.com> from "Bill Fenner" at Jun 8, 95 04:32:45 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4dev PL52]
Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> 
> In message <199506072228.SAA00374@skynet.ctr.columbia.edu> you write:
> >  (I'd like to know why file(1) only prints 'ex' instead of 'executable.')
> 
> because the phrase "BSD/386 demand paged (first page unmapped) pure ex\0" is 
> 50 bytes long, and /usr/src/usr.bin/file/file.h says

Try:

"BSD/386 demand paged (no 1st page) pure executable\0"

Instead.  8-).


					Terry Lambert
					terry@cs.weber.edu
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.