From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 14 11:11:05 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0F76106568A for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 11:11:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@icyb.net.ua) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A29458FC17 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 11:11:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@icyb.net.ua) Received: from odyssey.starpoint.kiev.ua (alpha-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.101]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id OAA09714 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 14:11:00 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@icyb.net.ua) Message-ID: <49E46F44.30606@icyb.net.ua> Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 14:11:00 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090406) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: glabel: newfs vs tunefs X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 11:11:07 -0000 I am not 100% sure, but it seems that glabel detects newfs -L labels very well, but doesn't see labels set by tunefs -L. I am not sure if ths happens always or "sometimes". Also, I used tunefs without -A option (it's documented as "potentially dangerous"). So could it possibly be that tunefs updates one copy of superblock, but glabel checks some other? -- Andriy Gapon