From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Tue Feb 28 11:09:34 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 137F7CF1079; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 11:09:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [192.108.105.60]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.soaustin.net", Issuer "StartCom Class 2 IV Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDCB47A2; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 11:09:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from lonesome.com (bones.soaustin.net [192.108.105.22]) by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 59515162; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 05:09:30 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 05:09:29 -0600 From: Mark Linimon To: Alexey Dokuchaev Cc: Mathieu Arnold , Mark Linimon , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r434867 - in head: biology/avida biology/gmap devel/k8048 devel/kyra devel/php-uprofiler multimedia/libde265 net-mgmt/fastnetmon Message-ID: <20170228110929.GA8021@lonesome.com> References: <201702261256.v1QCufsh008639@repo.freebsd.org> <8a75178e-f8b8-e52c-b118-c6781ed5393e@FreeBSD.org> <20170228085046.GA89691@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170228085046.GA89691@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 11:09:34 -0000 On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 08:50:46AM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > In all these cases Mark should've probably found what the real issue > is and provided better BROKEN messages. :-) I'm working through ports for which I have already created wrkdirs. The problems are not obvious from inspecting those. My goal is to try to flag all the arm ports that don't build. I'm sorry but I do not have time to diagnose and fix all of them. The poudriere build outputs on the cluster are still showing hundreds of ports failing to build. Marking them broken (and forwarding that fact to the maintainer) gives us a poudriere output on subsequent builds that tells us why each port did not build (the 'broken' message), rather than (e.g.) the terse "coredump". This is a step in the process towards making arm tier-1; not the completion. Folks should feel free to edit: https://wiki.freebsd.org/armv6/ports#How_you_can_help to state which ports they are actively working on and I'll stay out of their way. mcl