From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 17 17:36:06 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D17E5BF7 for ; Sun, 17 May 2015 17:36:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from outbound3.ore.mailhop.org (erouter6.ore.mailhop.org [54.187.213.119]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B15C3192B for ; Sun, 17 May 2015 17:36:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ilsoft.org (unknown [73.34.117.227]) by outbound3.ore.mailhop.org (Halon Mail Gateway) with ESMTPSA; Sun, 17 May 2015 17:35:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from revolution.hippie.lan (revolution.hippie.lan [172.22.42.240]) by ilsoft.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t4HHa35m012737; Sun, 17 May 2015 11:36:03 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from ian@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <1431884163.91685.55.camel@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: USB Armory support From: Ian Lepore To: Sevan / Venture37 Cc: freebsd-arm Date: Sun, 17 May 2015 11:36:03 -0600 In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.10 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 May 2015 17:36:06 -0000 On Sun, 2015-05-17 at 17:51 +0100, Sevan / Venture37 wrote: > Hi, > Has anyone looked at running FreeBSD on the USB Armory device? > > https://inversepath.com/usbarmory.html > https://media.ccc.de/browse/congress/2014/31c3_-_6541_-_en_-_saal_2_-_201412281730_-_forging_the_usb_armory_-_andrea_barisani.html#video > > > Sevan / Venture37 I've thought about it, but don't really have enough free time to buy one just to play with right now. I'd be willing to get one and put some effort into it if people have an interest in it. In theory it shouldn't take too much work since we already have basic support for other imx5x boards. -- Ian