From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Jul 26 00:06:39 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id AAA18176 for questions-outgoing; Sat, 26 Jul 1997 00:06:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ramses.prodige.qc.ca (fk691525@merlin.si.uqam.ca [132.208.219.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id AAA18169 for ; Sat, 26 Jul 1997 00:06:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ramses.prodige.qc.ca (localhost.prodige.qc.ca [127.0.0.1]) by ramses.prodige.qc.ca (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id DAA04512; Sat, 26 Jul 1997 03:04:46 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <33D9A18C.41C67EA6@er.uqam.ca> Date: Sat, 26 Jul 1997 03:04:44 -0400 From: Stephane Russell Organization: Universite du Quebec a Montreal X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2.2-RELEASE i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marty Leisner CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which version of binutils? References: <9707252135.AA00986@gnu.sdsp.mc.xerox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Marty Leisner wrote: > > this reminds me...will binutils 2.8 run for freebsd. > > I understand there's some type of ELF compatibity...where can > I read more about it? > Except for the files that comes with the package itself, I found no particular information about this issue. binutils-2.8.1 includes configuration for FreeBSD and most other BSD variants. This probably means that it should compile and work on it. But I have not tested this yet. That's yet to come. Stef