Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 08:23:50 -0400 From: Dan Langille <dan@langille.org> To: Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it> Cc: dvl@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bacula and S3 Message-ID: <1826560b-5579-009e-17a5-793bfec1c30b@langille.org> In-Reply-To: <5a634d07-2301-cbe2-ef86-abd45db3962f@netfence.it> References: <aa948986-097b-74c5-c524-1879d2306ddf@netfence.it> <f6a37175-413b-b7d9-396a-2af9e68bb11a@langille.org> <c7d31ddb-7271-fde1-2d13-b76856d59e48@andreaventuroli.it> <d504c3e5-f793-8d0f-f321-e840d2d6850e@langille.org> <5a634d07-2301-cbe2-ef86-abd45db3962f@netfence.it>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Andrea Venturoli wrote on 9/22/21 3:03 AM: > On 9/21/21 5:41 PM, Dan Langille wrote: > >>> I've made a separate port for libs3 and added an option to >>> bacula11-server (which will depend on the former). >>> >>> Unfortunately I'm still far from being able to test this properly. >> >> What is needed? > > So far I got up to the point where a backup job works to the cache, > tries to upload to cloud (I see https traffic) and fails (obviously, > as account data is currently fake). > I'm waiting for bureocracy to get the account, then I'll need to find > some spare time to test it. > > > >> I don't have time to add another project for testing. > > BTW, since I also maintain a jail to do Bacula regression testing, do > you know if this can be integrated? > Is there some support upstream for this? By upstream, do you mean https://regress.bacula.org/ ? Or something else? > > > >> I am sure others will be interested in testing. >> Please create a PR and attach a patch. > > I'll see what happens: if the project goes forward, I'll have quite > good testing and then produce a PR. > If the project dies in its cradle, I see if I can do some tests > myself, but I'll provide a PR in any case. > If someone, in the meantime, wants this... just ask. > > > >> If the new feature is off by default, it will not affect existing >> installations. Interested parties can enable it and test it themselves > > Yes, I added an option to your port which is off by default. > However, even if it's on, it shouldn't pose any problem (provided it > compiles on all platforms), since it just installs some libs which > will go unused. > > BTW, I decided to make a separate port (bacula11-libs3) because it was > easier for me; perhaps it could also be integrated into > bacula11-server, but AFAICT it would be more work. A separate port for the library seems fine to me. -- Dan Langille dan@langille.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1826560b-5579-009e-17a5-793bfec1c30b>