From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 2 19:47:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9528816A415; Sat, 2 Dec 2006 19:47:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.ntplx.net (mail.ntplx.net [204.213.176.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2106A43CA6; Sat, 2 Dec 2006 19:47:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from sea.ntplx.net (sea.ntplx.net [204.213.176.11]) by mail.ntplx.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/NETPLEX) with ESMTP id kB2JlOi2024952; Sat, 2 Dec 2006 14:47:24 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 14:47:24 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Eischen X-X-Sender: eischen@sea.ntplx.net To: Norikatsu Shigemura In-Reply-To: <20061203010732.7a371b62.nork@FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: References: <20061130003939.7d05b09a.nork@FreeBSD.org> <20061203010732.7a371b62.nork@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-ID: X-Greylist: Message whitelisted by DRAC access database, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (mail.ntplx.net [204.213.176.10]); Sat, 02 Dec 2006 14:47:24 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS and Clam AntiVirus (mail.ntplx.net) Cc: current@freebsd.org, ume@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvsync doesn't work simply on 7-current with SYMVER_ENABLED=yes X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Eischen List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2006 19:47:25 -0000 On Sun, 3 Dec 2006, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote: > On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 13:14:41 -0500 (EST) > Daniel Eischen wrote: >> I don't understand why kqueue and kevent are not found in cvsync, >> but still end up being referenced: > > cvsync doesn't use kqueue/kevent. Maybe these are used by > resolver in libc. > > I discussed with ume@. He suggested following patch. > I confirmed improvement. But... (Please see also attached > ktrace result). > > ume@ said that I don't know it is right. Old resolver codes > and RPC didn't use _kqueue. In fact, there are some kqueue > in some libc codes. Yes, I saw them (see my previous email from a few days ago)... Are you using cached? You have to change all kevent()'s in net/nscachedcli.c to _kevent(). -- DE