From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Apr 17 02:41:12 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id CAA22475
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 17 Apr 1997 02:41:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shadows.aeon.net (bsdhack@shadows.aeon.net [194.100.41.1])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id CAA22470
          for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 17 Apr 1997 02:41:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from bsdhack@localhost)
          by shadows.aeon.net (8.8.5/8.8.3) id MAA29425;
          Thu, 17 Apr 1997 12:41:16 +0300 (EET DST)
From: mika ruohotie <bsdhack@shadows.aeon.net>
Message-Id: <199704170941.MAA29425@shadows.aeon.net>
Subject: Re: Problems with afterstep and swap
In-Reply-To: <19970416224354.59658@keltia.freenix.fr> from Ollivier Robert at "Apr 16, 97 10:43:54 pm"
To: roberto@keltia.freenix.fr (Ollivier Robert)
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 1997 12:41:16 +0300 (EET DST)
Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL31 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> > 11.  I am also running the afterstep window manager.  I am using 
> This is your problem. I've not tried 1.0pre5/6 but with 1.0pre2, I was

well, i would suggest trying the pre6, since it's much better than the
previous pre versions... same with all the betas, bigger the number,
usually better the beta is...

> Afterstep is very nice but it is much too slow and eating too much memory.

i dont see any evidence into this memory leak with pre6


mickey