From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 11 15:51:54 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6D5916A41F for ; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 15:51:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: from web33310.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web33310.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.206.125]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8217043D88 for ; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 15:51:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 56924 invoked by uid 60001); 11 Dec 2005 15:51:45 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=oGHuXEBJxuuBXV2A4lnTEcx6UIgOpU+BU8qI+Woet8XWF8+52amE44slEzANXmseW11io2d3xCEEubhZshpNucWdEiei8AEdyC4Iw/iAPpHcdWe1xsLN7jLVFrNYth15Sj5EbUreuczipUUMeeIAuU3J4FCW7PaUlMQvJhuJICY= ; Message-ID: <20051211155145.56922.qmail@web33310.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.46.186.215] by web33310.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 07:51:45 PST Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 07:51:45 -0800 (PST) From: Danial Thom To: David Gerard , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <439C3AF2.3050400@thingy.apana.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: Re: Freebsd Theme Song X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: danial_thom@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 15:51:55 -0000 --- David Gerard wrote: > Danial Thom wrote: > > > developers that is lost. Their "theory" on > how to > > build a better mousetrap for MP is completely > > wrong, and now they're going to try something > > else, using the entire FreeBSD community as > > guinea pigs. First 5.4 was the answer. Then > 6.0. > > Now it looks like 6.0 sucks too. Its a damn > > shame. > > > Question: how's DragonFly looking on this > score? I realise it's not > production ready, but the project intrigues me. For UP, they are about the same as Freebsd, performance-wise. DP DFKY is already much better, at least from a consistency standpoint. With FreeBSD some things are actually slower DP than UP. At least DFLY has somewhat linear performance, although far from optimal. Of course FreeBSD has more bells and whistles that work, as DFLY is not focused on features at the moment. Of course Matt is difficult to convince of anything, and he's trying to do everything by himself. He has tremendous strengths but will never admit to his areas of weakness, which is a big problem. But I think fundamentally their approach is a good one. Its going to be a lot easier for DFLY to adjust on the fly then FreeBSD. FreeBSD is just a big mess, IMO. But I may retire before either of them are what they hope to be. And I'm not that old :-) anyone tested OPenBSD lately? DT __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com