From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Feb 23 09:42:32 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB490EF;
 Sat, 23 Feb 2013 09:42:32 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-ie0-x232.google.com (ie-in-x0232.1e100.net
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::232])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8833033B;
 Sat, 23 Feb 2013 09:42:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ie0-f178.google.com with SMTP id c13so1679471ieb.9
 for <multiple recipients>; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 01:42:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
 :subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
 bh=xIJOe7LxIRCQmPRumXp5+vhcDKDmicH9yioVd33YZJY=;
 b=FLOGMZwQzP1ow8Dx1uixp7e0O0lhod2j/jHSMVwOelw4f55GlrNrldvHeK2RH/f4LA
 +BO6S/ncJ/CyDEwo8ckoQqUnDZng9FFPxw7kubtEj2HV7XMEO4CQJRQOu89XdMj6xhOu
 3KRzHAUDWE0zxJPc5Q2G+CmXV2vi2ypwNEAiEWP/9tVV08of0UZUpzN6thno2v08STr3
 3EsGxZOvWNDI+/xqdz9ZBJZxxSuVRs3QvJhpZcAoDj3Dg44ZMIpiTp7MRjHpPMo/nD9D
 IprMb/66dwJwZkk8TMDHc3pvXSUt9qQnjVETKEqtAT0qBDmwshWinbqqS6DqvgZuQ7OH
 eXzA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.197.170 with SMTP id iv10mr612657igc.62.1361612552246;
 Sat, 23 Feb 2013 01:42:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.64.63.12 with HTTP; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 01:42:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.64.63.12 with HTTP; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 01:42:32 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <51288E35.1070301@rainbow-runner.nl>
References: <CD.60.09449.776D7215@smtp02.insight.synacor.com>
 <51288E35.1070301@rainbow-runner.nl>
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 09:42:32 +0000
Message-ID: <CADLo83-Skyzcn0VPUugQUVbPzygc9kUAMsLp4RtZDu0BPSA+=g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Status of math/gnumeric unable to keep up with upstream releases?
From: Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com>
To: Koop Mast <kwm@rainbow-runner.nl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Cc: gnome@freebsd.org, Thomas Mueller <mueller6724@bellsouth.net>,
 FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 09:42:33 -0000

On 23 Feb 2013 09:39, "Koop Mast" <kwm@rainbow-runner.nl> wrote:
>
> On 22-2-2013 21:35, Thomas Mueller wrote:
>>
>> What is the status of gnumeric being stuck at 1.10.17 when upstream has
released 1.12.0 ?
>>
>> I think gnumeric >= 1.11.x has gtk+ >= 3.0.0 as a dependency?  I checked
gnumeric web site www.gnumeric.org .
>>
>> I see this is the same snag that prevents transmission > 2.5 from
building, though possibly one could do
>>
>> portmaster -o transmission-cli transmission ?
>>
>> So what is the status now of gtk+ 3.x ?
>>
>>
>> Tom
>
>
> I'm working on a update for glib20 and gtk+2 and gtk+3. gnumeric is on
the list of ports to update afterwards. What I know of transmission is that
only transmission-gtk is currently broken because it wants a newer gtk+3
version then we got in ports.

That's exactly right.

Transmission's older version in the tree works just fine however.

Chris