From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 26 04:04:26 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F001816A41F for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2005 04:04:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD16743D1D for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2005 04:04:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id j5Q45Ub46388; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 21:05:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Warren" , Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 21:04:23 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1478 In-Reply-To: <200506260935.22563.shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com> Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: Portupgrade in Xfree86 pkg failed X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 04:04:26 -0000 >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Warren >Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2005 4:35 PM >To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Cc: Dejan Lesjak; Ted Mittelstaedt; Mark Linimon >Subject: Re: Portupgrade in Xfree86 pkg failed > > >On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 9:33 am, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: >> If you had mentioned in the beginning that this system was upgraded >> from 4 you would have never spawned this discussion. Since you don't >> like the discussion perhaps that is a lesson to you to make more >> complete questions, no? >> >> Ted > >If thats what you want to believe, who am i to argue :) It was just a question, not a statement. No I guess, then. Figures. Ted