From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 20 07:55:57 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E83231065672 for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 07:55:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A65718FC0C for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 07:55:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QjRdL-0005j9-N3 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 09:55:55 +0200 Received: from 178.214.36.169 ([178.214.36.169]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 09:55:55 +0200 Received: from citrin by 178.214.36.169 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 09:55:55 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Anton Yuzhaninov Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 07:55:44 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Vega Lines: 16 Sender: Anton Yuzhaninov Message-ID: References: X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 178.214.36.169 X-Comment-To: Rogelio User-Agent: tin/1.8.3-20070201 ("Scotasay") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/9.0-CURRENT (i386)) Subject: Re: high performance open source DHCP solution? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 07:55:58 -0000 On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 23:26:55 -0300, Rogelio wrote: R> The free DHCP solution, ISC, seems to be having scaling issues (i.e. R> handling only about 200 DHCPDISCOVER and 20 DHCPRENEW requests), and I R> was wondering if anyone had any open source suggestions of solutions R> that could scale much better? 1. May be it is possible to decrease load of DHCP server by increasing lease time. If address pool is the limit, adaptive-lease-time-threshold option in ISC dhcpd may be useful. 2. Which dhcpd version is used? According to changelog 4.2 has some performance improvements. -- Anton Yuzhaninov