From owner-freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Thu May 18 06:37:26 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25EF6D72F78 for ; Thu, 18 May 2017 06:37:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: from mail-io0-x234.google.com (mail-io0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1F041E03 for ; Thu, 18 May 2017 06:37:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: by mail-io0-x234.google.com with SMTP id f102so22716198ioi.2 for ; Wed, 17 May 2017 23:37:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=AKk4Tl1GkTLbvhAADMKYGgQPzA+4YXUx+Q/oqYkhew8=; b=eecAOJ4s1VyAnxiOBMpFArH8rFrseupBNJgIjUNk5u3HQXDR/AbYnBFQRrxNvVXnUS +30bDAMVqWE7SDnon91Xw4UR+CvTtHd4LdQo+EedJPlprRmx+dbr9w+UO4+CVvRvqf6o tqjRQf1wJcVICSEHwiJrxdhWwFa4pqxPXkWbvF56VmHLOWL/lpg088tvWoGOJifBFQvV ronTqFbEpdy4ITT4pR5MTa6JZCYQWxPhqbNoo2098l2AFGxPSmxt+/mAfOo4PRkvdUxA yCR0eF1FVm8dM5Rpqz4mdiWnqIJl/EnmtR/Ob8SUaEJqkeZoEJBjlazYxYAUlmkCk1yl zeZw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=AKk4Tl1GkTLbvhAADMKYGgQPzA+4YXUx+Q/oqYkhew8=; b=APVWCyHCwK6RD/L2U0KOxqTbewwOBmHaqSQ6C10+s7CLi6g7usK+fLxitTx70IQ5uX oegxSdNUvOOCM5eJYssEc+S2N7HgMnANsATtDuIs+pmgfCY06W1abZ+6MuWQD0E/ZGhm RPQuL7DSYqLjTMiburViuQAYhzLPZC4SHSNU2H9+v5+i/+EsRyADlRXkXIHXJHwGnOat G5q8LN4YugOQnFbiOgz7RDMF0PqzRBOZpFrA7Kd6Z3D8c4hJ6RlW2BhecM12P/vK1Z0B dtcfZdktIvM2hoG17K/qTI7MjqmrnvdamgHs7yvdLJzcDI4begmAiV85JTnkobcv+mdA uCHQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcDe8DP4O8SKLBp7IqFVpauNeQx9KXDqjA7F+7ybi/QOsca4/vSh pFllXMcdLExobvWMUl2DyrEFDBUVGjPa X-Received: by 10.107.188.132 with SMTP id m126mr3190458iof.148.1495089445063; Wed, 17 May 2017 23:37:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: wlosh@bsdimp.com Received: by 10.79.126.6 with HTTP; Wed, 17 May 2017 23:37:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [2603:300b:6:5100:cdd4:9b25:be09:9f7d] In-Reply-To: <20170518055352.bflapm6mmfhgl4y4@ivaldir.net> References: <20170518055352.bflapm6mmfhgl4y4@ivaldir.net> From: Warner Losh Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 00:37:24 -0600 X-Google-Sender-Auth: ayzyUdRe3l1S8tzHXH9yHZce0ME Message-ID: Subject: Re: make concurrency kit a module To: Baptiste Daroussin Cc: Adrian Chadd , freebsd-current , "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 06:37:26 -0000 On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 11:53 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 06:04:09PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: >> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D10778 >> > > Except there are plans to use it elsewhere. Many areas may be improved using it. > > Having it as a module would mean some devs might refrain from using it because > there is no waranty for it to be there > > Areas like VFS and network stack could have a good benefice from using it. > > Out of curiousity what size is saved? I'd planned on using it newbus to solve the lifetime issues we have with device_t's.... Warner