From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Aug 5 20:10:01 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id UAA13296 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 5 Aug 1996 20:10:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from orion.webspan.net (root@orion.webspan.net [206.154.70.41]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id UAA13268 for ; Mon, 5 Aug 1996 20:09:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (gpalmer@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by orion.webspan.net (8.7.5/8.6.12) with SMTP id XAA18161; Mon, 5 Aug 1996 23:09:38 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: orion.webspan.net: Host gpalmer@localhost [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol To: Tony Kimball cc: 100626.3506@CompuServe.COM, dfr@render.com, hackers@freebsd.org From: "Gary Palmer" Subject: Re: 100BASE-TX hubs In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 05 Aug 1996 18:11:10 CDT." <199608052311.SAA26259@compound.Think.COM> Date: Mon, 05 Aug 1996 23:09:38 -0400 Message-ID: <18156.839300978@orion.webspan.net> Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Tony Kimball wrote in message ID <199608052311.SAA26259@compound.Think.COM>: > Most folks seem to have no problems using arbitrary vendor 100TX > end-station and hub equipment, mix-n-match. With good reason ... it's a standard that, for once, most people seem to have been able to agree to follow :-) The only problems I've EVER seen on a 100bTX net were to do with (poor) cabling. Gary -- Gary Palmer FreeBSD Core Team Member FreeBSD: Turning PC's into workstations. See http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/ for info