From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jan 11 13:17:57 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from megahack.com (portal.megahack.com [206.230.54.106]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4F7837B417 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 13:17:53 -0800 (PST) Received: (from steve@localhost) by megahack.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0BLHkV00297; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 15:17:46 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from steve) From: Steven Farmer MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15423.22138.622826.566389@catbert.megahack.com> Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 15:17:46 -0600 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Should /sbin/mount_smbfs be static? X-Mailer: VM 7.00 under 21.1 (patch 14) "Cuyahoga Valley" XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Is it ok for /sbin/mount_smbfs to be dynamically linked? Just wondering, since I noticed that it's the only thing /sbin that is: [catbert] ~> uname -a FreeBSD catbert.megahack.com 4.5-RC FreeBSD 4.5-RC #0: Fri Jan 11 12:32:22 CST 2002 steve@catbert.megahack.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CATBERT i386 [catbert] ~> file /sbin/mount_smbfs /sbin/mount_smbfs: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (FreeBSD), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), stripped [catbert] ~> ldd /sbin/mount_smbfs /sbin/mount_smbfs: libsmb.so.1 => /usr/lib/libsmb.so.1 (0x28066000) libc.so.4 => /usr/lib/libc.so.4 (0x28071000) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message