Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 17:20:07 -0700 From: Adam Strohl <adams-freebsd@ateamsystems.com> To: marino@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: r353029 broke net-mgmt/zabbix2*-server options Message-ID: <53740837.3040202@ateamsystems.com> In-Reply-To: <5373213C.7040102@marino.st> References: <CAAoTqfuADqMFrE%2B8mmWJTAhF9SX=E89iLmQ3KNSaqSN40Anfnw@mail.gmail.com> <5373213C.7040102@marino.st>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 5/14/2014 12:54 AM, John Marino wrote: > On 5/14/2014 09:42, Pavel Timofeev wrote: >> Hi! >> After this commit to regular ports tree both zabbix (2.0 and 2.2) >> ports was messed. >> For example: >> ====> Options available for the single DB: you have to select exactly >> one of them >> MYSQL=on: MySQL database support >> PGSQL=off: PostgreSQL database support >> SQLITE=off: SQLite database support >> ORACLE=off: Oracle database support >> ODBC=off: Support for database checks via ODBC >> ===> Use 'make config' to modify these settings >> >> ODBC shouldn't be in DB section. See in 2014Q2 - that's how it has to >> look. Please, fix it > > I am somebody completely unfamiliar with this port. So I am curious why > "ODBC shouldn't be in DB section". ODBC is a database driver, so why > shouldn't it be in the database section? > > You state it needs to be a certain way, but the justification is that it > was that way before rather than stating the real reason for those of us > that aren't familiar with this particular port. ODBC isn't a back end DB option for Zabbix, it's an option for Zabbix to test/monitor ODBC connections. Totally different from the "<n> database support" options.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?53740837.3040202>