From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 26 23:39:36 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A73FD8D7; Mon, 26 Aug 2013 23:39:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jfvogel@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ve0-x22d.google.com (mail-ve0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c01::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 083FC295B; Mon, 26 Aug 2013 23:39:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ve0-f173.google.com with SMTP id cy12so2585017veb.18 for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2013 16:39:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=StaHPv3JaA2uyd8RA6vLbGBVTa1E9rMB1u4HNXD3vOQ=; b=hDqkC5SaVQNsl7gNhW2Vrp5mPD4K25h+3U2XriaDewNvl4bv7VGxFif6XPuq3uXTqy ZCGkNY5WopySG0HebUkoMN3aSy4YBNVQ0C2e7AEeZAbzRvGxceXLL8abJUdw9CEgFRzO NiEALV+NtfXi1fpxmF74ugm68MweO24EM4jARHvGs7Wp1i5E618JURSTd6Hq4iDOeNVK GRr0ZnlXsqoiEhCYNh6NWEn5h7Ji6AXJ5Yr6hyUo5t9U1zu3IgoStMtA4GI3OQ4OPRYE Ga1Mx/eLpTQsXGq8WiUbwQUjzEGeO0EogkHHvHJnalVQxtdrYp50SzwWkDwcM6PTvJcu m9Pg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.96.100 with SMTP id dr4mr14105240vdb.17.1377560375179; Mon, 26 Aug 2013 16:39:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.159.141 with HTTP; Mon, 26 Aug 2013 16:39:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <521BBD21.4070304@freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 16:39:35 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Flow ID, LACP, and igb From: Jack Vogel To: Adrian Chadd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: Jack F Vogel , "Justin T. Gibbs" , Andre Oppermann , Alan Somers , "net@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 23:39:36 -0000 None that I can think of. On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > ... is there any reason we wouldn't want to have the TX and RX for a given > flow mapped to the same core? > > > > > -adrian >