From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 23 20:36:46 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4100516A41A; Thu, 23 Aug 2007 20:36:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scf@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.farley.org (farley.org [67.64.95.201]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03A3613C459; Thu, 23 Aug 2007 20:36:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scf@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [192.168.1.211] (baba.farley.org [192.168.1.211] (may be forged)) by mail.farley.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l7NKGwsJ089839; Thu, 23 Aug 2007 15:16:58 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from scf@FreeBSD.org) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 15:16:58 -0500 (CDT) From: "Sean C. Farley" To: Michal Varga In-Reply-To: <1187898075.1341.11.camel@xenon.stonehenge.sk> Message-ID: References: <786602c60708222346s9d45d45o6ff7b362d67fe938@mail.gmail.com> <20070823145000.tr2wulubs484ck0w@webmail.leidinger.net> <20070823190157.GA9896@freebsd.org> <1187898075.1341.11.camel@xenon.stonehenge.sk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on mail.farley.org Cc: emulation@FreeBSD.org, Roman Divacky Subject: Re: Moving to a more recent linux base, when? X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 20:36:46 -0000 On Thu, 23 Aug 2007, Michal Varga wrote: > On Thu, 2007-08-23 at 21:01 +0200, Roman Divacky wrote: > >> let me clarify things a little. the 2.6 support in 7-current is good >> enough. I am not aware of panics and the only "does not work because >> of 2.6" program I know is java which I have sent a patch to kib@ to >> commit it (so it should be in before 7.0R) > > Well, just for the record, Enemy Territory stopped working with 2.6 > for me, but I can live with that (Doom 3 runs still fine, for > example). On my -CURRENT desktop, I have 2.6 support enabled from the > first day of commit and never plan to go back, not just for one game > or even Java. From the perspective of a common everyday desktop user, > I'd call current 2.6 support "fine enough", and we are talking about > 7.0 that's not even out yet. Anyway, good job, Roman and the rest of > the team. Out of curiosity, would setting LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.2 allow Enemy Territory to work on -CURRENT? Sean -- scf@FreeBSD.org