From owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Mon Apr 30 05:03:05 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A57BDFC331D for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 05:03:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: from vps1.elischer.org (vps1.elischer.org [204.109.63.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "vps1.elischer.org", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D73A7C71A for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 05:03:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: from Julian-MBP3.local (220-253-154-11.dyn.iinet.net.au [220.253.154.11]) (authenticated bits=0) by vps1.elischer.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w3U52vw1097596 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sun, 29 Apr 2018 22:03:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Subject: Re: vtfs? To: Paul Vixie , freebsd-virtualization References: <5AE69FB7.1010706@redbarn.org> From: Julian Elischer Message-ID: Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 13:02:52 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5AE69FB7.1010706@redbarn.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 05:03:05 -0000 On 30/4/18 12:46 pm, Paul Vixie wrote: > i use nfs for this but i don't like it. > > we have vtnet and vtbd. where is vtfs? > > as in, a vm-independent (virtualbox, vmware, bhyve, kvm, xen, etc) > standard that would let sysadmins export file systems through > something that might look to the guest a lot like vfs, but would be > implemented in the host a lot like nullfs (so, more like jails in > this way.) > I heard rumours someone is working on it but they are exactly that so far..  rumours. > i realize that apple and microsoft clients would have hell to pay > with semantic incompatibilities like case-sensitive file names. but > i still want it, because i want mmap for high performance read-write > multi-vm applications, and nfs prohibits this. > > vixie > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-virtualization-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >