From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 21 01:23:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8E1216A4CE; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 01:23:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lakermmtao10.cox.net (lakermmtao10.cox.net [68.230.240.29]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF78D43D1F; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 01:23:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Received: from dolphin.local.net ([68.11.71.51]) by lakermmtao10.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02.01 201-2131-111-104-103-20040709) with ESMTP <20040721012256.IHYZ18630.lakermmtao10.cox.net@dolphin.local.net>; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 21:22:56 -0400 Received: from dolphin.local.net (localhost.local.net [127.0.0.1]) by dolphin.local.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6L1MvE2011420; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 20:22:57 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from conrads@dolphin.local.net) Received: (from conrads@localhost) by dolphin.local.net (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i6L1Mvv6011419; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 20:22:57 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from conrads) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.5.5 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 20:22:56 -0500 (CDT) Organization: A Rag-Tag Band of Drug-Crazed Hippies From: "Conrad J. Sabatier" To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-config@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "Next Generation" kernel configuration? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: conrads@cox.net List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 01:23:28 -0000 On 21-Jul-2004 Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: [snip] > Has this ever come up for discussion before? Now that we have rcNG, > with its explicit declarations of dependencies, has any thought been > given to doing something similar with kernel configuration files? > Something still human-readable, yet more orderly and systematic, > easier for a machine to interpret, present and verify? Just a note of clarification here: the use of the term "kernel configuration files" in the above paragraph refers to the entire set of files residing under /sys/conf and friends, not the user's kernel config. Just wanted to make sure. :-) -- Conrad J. Sabatier -- "In Unix veritas"