From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Nov 30 01:10:57 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAF0216A4CE
	for <current@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 01:10:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from email01.aon.at (WARSL402PIP8.highway.telekom.at [195.3.96.97])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2BDDB43FE1
	for <current@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 01:10:55 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from shoesoft@gmx.net)
Received: (qmail 217340 invoked from network); 30 Nov 2003 09:10:53 -0000
Received: from m125p009.dipool.highway.telekom.at (HELO ?62.46.5.137?)
	([62.46.5.137]) (envelope-sender <shoesoft@gmx.net>)
	by qmail1rs.highway.telekom.at (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
	for <truckman@FreeBSD.org>; 30 Nov 2003 09:10:53 -0000
From: Stefan Ehmann <shoesoft@gmx.net>
To: Don Lewis <truckman@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <200311280002.hAS029eF016292@gw.catspoiler.org>
References: <200311280002.hAS029eF016292@gw.catspoiler.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <1070183457.1099.2.camel@shoeserv.freebsd>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 10:10:58 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: current@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: panic on 5.2 BETA: blockable sleep lock
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 09:10:57 -0000

On Fri, 2003-11-28 at 01:02, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 27 Nov, Stefan Ehmann wrote:
> > On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 08:33, Don Lewis wrote:
> >> The problem is that selrecord() wants to lock a MTX_DEF mutex, which can
> >> cause a context switch if the mutex is already locked by another thread.
> >> This is contrary to what bktr_poll() wants to accomplish by calling
> >> critical_enter().
> > 
> > Strange enough that does not seem to happen with a kernel built without
> > INVARIANTS and WITNESS. Does this make any sense or is this just by
> > chance?
> 
> You might try the patch below with WITNESS enabled.  I don't have the
> hardware, so I can't test it.  It compiles for me, but for all I know it
> could delete all your files if you run it.

Any chance for getting this committed?