From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Oct 22 11:42:47 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 375DCBAD
 for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 11:42:47 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from tevans.uk@googlemail.com)
Received: from mail-la0-x231.google.com (mail-la0-x231.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::231])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B959D23DB
 for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 11:42:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-la0-f49.google.com with SMTP id eh20so1639149lab.22
 for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 04:42:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=googlemail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :cc:content-type;
 bh=Qf41qs3gbrmTvKefGiuwOzd5uDPKq66V9TmZCQJ97j4=;
 b=yPNDSgw1iA/n/ozS9favJvbQgmjKt8nVX2Dh5Guwzi3q/TyfY+gyyfzlq1xjEXClam
 LO87rr4D6agsoUCUPPRRml3aYhwAYBdTPSXbWKdqe5ONr5X1288KZn+O+VHPMLW08tzY
 uGay6ew9W+8J2p6PRkQAn2J53+zi2zzAujOBkexgCiHkinACM1ImoR8haFJl/gz4FYW0
 +JHE5T7tTr+5E6iv4Gk03X6+f2Fqp/zzhQIQIQJpN9UNB00DU8Tp3IoDCTuycXyn5TQ9
 0MeVXJwC2xO4ham5uteOicvLvM9bNCJxD6spqH0QYqLph/YXu8o4oYGQt+y9kjgTDlNf
 FKng==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.120.5 with SMTP id ky5mr17859890lab.18.1382442164199;
 Tue, 22 Oct 2013 04:42:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.165.69 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 04:42:44 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20131021.133036.045.1@DOMY-PC>
References: <20130719.174511.786.3@DOMY-PC>
 <201310071212.05281.jhb@freebsd.org>
 <20131016.104912.479.1@DOMY-PC>
 <201310161650.52354.jhb@freebsd.org>
 <CA+tpaK23Wo8Nemi-xUy3-BZSUdeWkpWQh_o6Ws=mxi6jrbubvw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20131021.133036.045.1@DOMY-PC>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 12:42:44 +0100
Message-ID: <CAFHbX1KCynW-o5kTSzzZEChZ=ETqUodd4kHF_YyjQ0WTuYS0HQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: UFS related panic (daily <-> find)
From: Tom Evans <tevans.uk@googlemail.com>
To: rank1seeker@gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: FreeBSD Hackers <hackers@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
 <freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-hackers>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 11:42:47 -0000

On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 2:30 PM,  <rank1seeker@gmail.com> wrote:
> If I can't use memtest86+-4.20, to determine failing module, then what is a
> use of it at all?
> Test RAM speed perhaps?

You can't use it to prove that a stick is not faulty, but you can use
it to prove that it is. 5 hours is perhaps not long enough to exercise
the issue, or perhaps there is a different, longer, test suite you can
choose.

Cheers

Tom